History Repeats Itself
Every day news is shoved into your skull. News flashes, breaking stories – yet only the names seem to change. It seems that not a day goes by without someone getting arrested for selling or using drugs. Someone’s picked up for DUI. Some political figure does something bad; or good, but then it’s something that everyday people do such as read to kids in a school. And that’s a bit messed up in itself: teacher reads stories to kids – not news; politician seeking election reads to kids – makes front page of national news.
Not even the “unexpected” news such as earthquakes, storms, or other nature-based disasters are that different. Almost every time people are left homeless, hundreds to thousands die, people’s pets die while some are reunited with their families. A disaster area’s declared. State, federal, and in some cases international governments step in to help. Red Cross and other agencies show up and setup tents and start the search and rescue. Media shows up with cameras to record the horrific footage (for live coverage), while interviewing people about how bad it really is. Many people donate time or money to help out. Cleanup crews show up days, weeks, or months later. Things are restored. Life returns to “normal”.
But it’s all the same, just different names and places. Not that it isn’t a horrible tragedy but it’s still the same as far as news and actions.
And it seems that no matter what happens, thanks primarily to news agencies I’d bet, whatever agency that goes in to help always screws up something that causes people to demand justice. Not saying in some instances they’re right, that some place truly screwed up, but what about all the other instances where they did well! Think of it like this: an organization helps out ten thousand people and gets them completely resettled and back to “normal”, five hundred people get screwed over for one reason or another, do you ever hear about the good the place did?
In the end, it’s the same. Same news day in and out. Same things happen, people don’t learn from the past mistakes, and it keeps on repeating. It makes one wonder, where is the ultimate failure – the individuals, or society?
Picture the society as a business, and the individuals as the employees. As a whole, the business can do many good things, or many bad things. But in order for things to take place, the employees have to do something. If an employee discovers a part they have is defective, but they say nothing, the company releases a defective product. In that case, it’s the employee, not the company, that’s at fault. But if the company knows the part is defective, and they use it anyway, it’s the company that’s at fault – but really, it’s not the “company” so much as it is the “group of employees that passed the motion to use the defective part” that’s to blame. So it’s still an employee, or employees, that are to blame.
Same type of thing for all other news material: someone knows there’s a problem, they either speak up and are ignored, or don’t speak up at all – no one learns, history repeats itself.
Think of it like this: A parent knows their child is using meth. They try to get help for the child, which doesn’t involve the police, and the child fights back. The child keeps on using meth and ends up robbing or hurting someone to get their fix. Now, it’s entirely the child that’s to blame – but the parents could’ve done more to prevent it. Or think about politicians, if you have a homosexual or bisexual politician roaming around demanding rules to ban homosexuality or such – someone should call them out on it. Or if the politician’s taking bribes from a company, that they just happen to pass legislation to help out the company, someone should say something. If a police officer’s dealing drugs, someone should report them.
Easier said than done for some, after all who’d want to report a gang murder when the members live in your apartment – but the point is still valid. Whenever you see something on the news, there’s someone (sometimes a group) that isn’t surprised. They’re the ones that think “took that long to happen?” and similar. But the better question should be this: if they knew it’d happen, actually knew, why didn’t they do something to stop it.
Not even the “unexpected” news such as earthquakes, storms, or other nature-based disasters are that different. Almost every time people are left homeless, hundreds to thousands die, people’s pets die while some are reunited with their families. A disaster area’s declared. State, federal, and in some cases international governments step in to help. Red Cross and other agencies show up and setup tents and start the search and rescue. Media shows up with cameras to record the horrific footage (for live coverage), while interviewing people about how bad it really is. Many people donate time or money to help out. Cleanup crews show up days, weeks, or months later. Things are restored. Life returns to “normal”.
But it’s all the same, just different names and places. Not that it isn’t a horrible tragedy but it’s still the same as far as news and actions.
And it seems that no matter what happens, thanks primarily to news agencies I’d bet, whatever agency that goes in to help always screws up something that causes people to demand justice. Not saying in some instances they’re right, that some place truly screwed up, but what about all the other instances where they did well! Think of it like this: an organization helps out ten thousand people and gets them completely resettled and back to “normal”, five hundred people get screwed over for one reason or another, do you ever hear about the good the place did?
In the end, it’s the same. Same news day in and out. Same things happen, people don’t learn from the past mistakes, and it keeps on repeating. It makes one wonder, where is the ultimate failure – the individuals, or society?
Picture the society as a business, and the individuals as the employees. As a whole, the business can do many good things, or many bad things. But in order for things to take place, the employees have to do something. If an employee discovers a part they have is defective, but they say nothing, the company releases a defective product. In that case, it’s the employee, not the company, that’s at fault. But if the company knows the part is defective, and they use it anyway, it’s the company that’s at fault – but really, it’s not the “company” so much as it is the “group of employees that passed the motion to use the defective part” that’s to blame. So it’s still an employee, or employees, that are to blame.
Same type of thing for all other news material: someone knows there’s a problem, they either speak up and are ignored, or don’t speak up at all – no one learns, history repeats itself.
Think of it like this: A parent knows their child is using meth. They try to get help for the child, which doesn’t involve the police, and the child fights back. The child keeps on using meth and ends up robbing or hurting someone to get their fix. Now, it’s entirely the child that’s to blame – but the parents could’ve done more to prevent it. Or think about politicians, if you have a homosexual or bisexual politician roaming around demanding rules to ban homosexuality or such – someone should call them out on it. Or if the politician’s taking bribes from a company, that they just happen to pass legislation to help out the company, someone should say something. If a police officer’s dealing drugs, someone should report them.
Easier said than done for some, after all who’d want to report a gang murder when the members live in your apartment – but the point is still valid. Whenever you see something on the news, there’s someone (sometimes a group) that isn’t surprised. They’re the ones that think “took that long to happen?” and similar. But the better question should be this: if they knew it’d happen, actually knew, why didn’t they do something to stop it.
Labels: history repeats itself


